AS-472-97 - Proposed Administrative
Structure |
Cal Poly
State of California San Luis Obispo CA 93407
M E M O R A N D U M
| To: |
Harvey Greenwald
Chair, Academic Senate |
| Date: |
March 27, 1997 |
| From: |
Warren J. Baker
President |
| Subject: |
Academic Senate Resolution
AS-472-97/gebadhoc
General Education and Breadth Program: Proposed Administrative
Structure |
Thank you for your memo of February 19, 1997, which transmitted
Academic Senate Resolution (AS-472_97/gebadhoc) on General
Education and Breadth Program: Proposed Administrative Structure.
I am pleased to approve the Senate Resolution on the proposed
administrative structure for the General Education and Breadth
Program. This is an important step forward for the University
in the refinement of the General Education and Breadth Program.
This new governance structure has great promise in bringing
fresh perspectives to bear on general education at Cal Poly
and guiding this vital dimension of undergraduate academic
life. Together with the 4-unit conversion and a new GEB template,
this governance structure will help achieve the goals of strengthening
and streamlining the general education curriculum. I very
much appreciate the efforts of the Academic Senate in moving
this issue through the extensive review and consultation process.
In the course of discussions and review of the general education
governance structure, questions have arisen about the representative
membership of the General Education Committee, particularly
with regard to student participation. The intent of the governance
proposal is that general education henceforth be viewed and
treated as a coherent program rather than a disaggregated
set of course requirements. For this reason, the membership
of the committee responsible for the program is constituted
similar to that of a department or program faculty and the
processes through which the general education program handles
courses, curriculum and other policy and operational issues,
are similar to the way other academic programs and departments
handle these same matters. To assure breadth of representation,
sub-committees, which are formal, functional components of
the General Education Committee, include members who do not
hold faculty positions, particularly student representatives.
The sub-committees are a crucial part of the overall standing
general education governance structure and will have significant
authority and accountability. As a result, the student voice
in general education should be strengthened. ASI supported
this proposal as it was being developed and reviewed, and
the proposal received strong support in the Academic Senate,
passing by a vote of 34 to 14. This arrangement satisfies
the conditions of Executive Order 595: General Education-
Breadth Requirements.
Please express my appreciation to both the members of the
Academic Senate and the General Education and Breadth Ad Hoc
Committee for their efforts.
GENERAL EDUCATION AND BREADTH PROGRAM
ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE
Conceptual Goals of the General Education and Breadth Program
The California State University requires General Education
and Breadth programs designed to assure graduates have made
noteworthy progress toward becoming truly educated persons
and provide means whereby graduates will have:
A. the ability to think clearly and logically, to find information
and examine it critically, to communicate orally and in writing,
and to reason quantitatively;
B. appreciable knowledge about their own bodies and minds,
about how human society has developed and how it now functions,
about the physical world in which they live, about the other
forms of life with which they share the world, and about the
cultural endeavors and legacies of their civilizations;
C. an understanding and appreciation of the principles, methodologies,
value systems, and thought processes employed in human inquiries.
It is the ultimate aim of the program that the habits of
thought and discussion, of engaging one's curiosity, creativity,
and penchant for discovery, and of inquiry and learning, nurtured
in Cal Poly's GEB program, will persist throughout the lives
of all students.
Responsibility for the General Education and Breadth Program
General Education and Breadth is a university level program
and requires the strong leadership of the university provost
and president.
Cal Poly's General Education and Breadth program is the administrative
responsibility of the GEB Committee. This administrative function
is meant to be consistent with normal university procedures
involving curriculum and to parallel the process used by departments
in making programmatic proposals. Just as a department makes
curricular and programmatic recommendations via a dean to
the Academic Senate, the GEB Committee, after appropriate
consultation with affected units, makes curricular and programmatic
recommendations to the Academic Senate via the provost. The
provost submits the GEB proposals to the Academic Senate for
review and recommendations. The ultimate decisions and responsibilities
for the General Education and Breadth program, as with any
program, lie with the president.
The GEB Committee
The GEB Committee is charged with assuming a vigorous leadership
and administrative role in the development and maintenance
of a strong and coherent General Education and Breadth program
that meets the noble purposes of its conceptual goals and
fosters a stimulating academic and intellectual environment
on the Cal Poly campus. By its own initiatives, and those
of the university community, and by consultation with appropriate
campus groups, the GEB Committee will make recommendations,
through its director, to the provost on all matters and aspects
pertaining to the General Education and Breadth program including
philosophy, content, format, delivery, and adherence to standards
of quality.
Among the Specific Duties Assigned to the GEB Committee are
the Following:
* program development, monitoring, and assessment
* designating GEB courses
* encouraging innovation
* issues related to community college GEB programs
* interaction with academic and administrative units
* acting on petitions regarding GEB requirements
* promoting and coordinating GEB related activities such as
conferences, seminars, and speakers
Membership: A director and eight committee members will compose
the GEB Committee; two from the College of Science and Mathematics,
two from the College of Liberal Arts, and one from each of
the four professional colleges. Committee members will serve
three-year renewable terms that are staggered to promote continuity.
Qualifications of GEB Committee Members: Committee members
will be faculty members with a demonstrated interest in GEB
and who have a thorough understanding of, and deep conviction
and commitment to, the philosophy and conceptual goals of
the General Education and Breadth program.
Appointment of GEB Committee Members: The provost appoints
GEB Committee members after consultation with the Academic
Senate.
Director of the GEB Committee
Responsibilities: The director has administrative responsibility
for the university's General Education and Breadth program
and will lead the GEB Committee in fulfilling its charges,
responsibilities, and duties.
Qualifications: The director will have a thorough understanding
of, and deep conviction and commitment to, the philosophy
and goals of the General Education and Breadth Program, extensive
experience in teaching, developing, and supervising GEB courses,
and demonstrated leadership experience in curricular matters.
Normally, the director will be a faculty member in either
the College of Liberal Arts or the College of Science and
Mathematics.
Selection: The director will be appointed by the provost
after solicitation of nominations and applications and consultation
with the GEB Committee and the Academic Senate.
Term: Three-year renewable terms at the pleasure of the provost.
GEB Subject Area Committees
Subject Area Committees will be established and modified
by the GEB Committee for the purpose of advising the committee
on courses and programs within each area, and to review courses
and programs already in place. Initially there will be three
area committees - (1) Arts and Humanities, (2) Science, Mathematics,
and Technology, and (3) Social and Behavioral Sciences - that
will be composed of seven members each, including one student.
At least four of the members and the student must be from
department/colleges in the subject area. Area committee members
will be appointed by the GEB Committee after consultation
with the Academic Senate. Terms: three-year renewable.
|